December 10, 2025 a 04:38 pm
RJF: Analysts Ratings - Raymond James Financial, Inc.
Raymond James Financial, Inc. operates within a diverse financial services sector, offering a range of services from private client group to asset management and banking. Over recent months, the analyst ratings for RJF have shown a general tendency towards 'Hold', indicating a cautious sentiment amongst analysts. The absence of 'Sell' recommendations suggests a degree of confidence in maintaining current positions.
Historical Stock Grades
The table below offers insight into the latest analyst ratings for Raymond James Financial. Despite the varied services the company provides, the scores currently reflect a preference for a 'Hold' strategy, suggesting stability without strong bullish or bearish leanings.
| Recommendation | Count | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Strong Buy | 1 | |
| Buy | 3 | |
| Hold | 8 | |
| Sell | 0 | |
| Strong Sell | 0 |
Sentiment Development
The accumulating data highlights a notable shift towards more conservative recommendations such as 'Hold'. While 'Strong Buy' ratings have decreased, the consistency in 'Hold' ratings suggests cautiousness, possibly due to market volatility or internal company strategies.
- The past months show a shift in sentiment with the rise of 'Hold' recommendations.
- Decline in 'Strong Buy' indicates reduced aggressive investment sentiment.
- No significant movement in 'Sell' categories points towards maintaining trust in the firm's stability.
Percentage Trends
The changing landscape of analyst recommendations reveals a reallocation from aggressive strategies towards neutral stances. This change is reflected in the increased percentage of 'Hold' recommendations amidst a decline in 'Strong Buy'. Such sentiment underscores an understanding of current market complexities.
- Strong Buy ratings have decreased over the period, falling from approximately 13% to 7%.
- Hold ratings have risen, forming over half of the total ratings by December 2025.
- Analysts seem to advocate more caution and reduced risk, possibly indicating market or business model uncertainties.
Latest Analyst Recommendations
The table below summarizes recently issued analyst recommendations, demonstrating little change in opinion over the latest reviews. Such stability may reflect satisfaction with the current performance trajectory or limited new information altering views.
| Date | New Recommendation | Last Recommendation | Publisher |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-23 | Neutral | Neutral | JP Morgan |
| 2025-10-23 | Market Perform | Market Perform | Keefe, Bruyette & Woods |
| 2025-10-23 | Hold | Hold | TD Cowen |
| 2025-10-23 | Market Perform | Market Perform | BMO Capital |
| 2025-10-23 | Market Outperform | Market Outperform | JMP Securities |
Analyst Recommendations with Change of Opinion
The table below highlights recent instances where analysts have altered their opinions. These adjustments, including upgrades and downgrades, are pivotal in understanding shifts in market sentiment or perceived company value alterations.
| Date | New Recommendation | Last Recommendation | Publisher |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-07 | Neutral | Overweight | JP Morgan |
| 2025-01-06 | Buy | Neutral | Goldman Sachs |
| 2024-12-12 | Equal Weight | Overweight | Wells Fargo |
| 2024-10-09 | Market Outperform | Market Perform | JMP Securities |
| 2024-07-08 | Peer Perform | Outperform | Wolfe Research |
Interpretation
Analyzing the diverse array of recommendations, it becomes apparent that there is a trend towards a more conservative 'Hold' stance, aligning with market uncertainties or valuation ranges. While certain downgrades indicate acuity in price perceptions or profit forecasts, upgrades highlight newly perceived opportunities. Overall, the stability in recommendations indicates analysts' focus on mitigating risk while gauging future gains under economic variabilities.
Conclusion
The evaluation of Raymond James Financial, Inc. illustrates a predominant neutral sentiment among analysts, marked by heightened 'Hold' recommendations. This tendency towards caution may be due to broader economic factors or inherent business challenges. While the stability in 'Hold' suggests persisting value, the relatively minor proportion of 'Buy' or 'Strong Buy' reflects limited aggressive growth prospects. However, the absence of 'Sell' signals could indicate confidence in maintaining current performance levels. Overall, aware investors may read these analyses as a cue for measured strategies and moderate expectation settings.