December 02, 2025 a 09:00 am
PG: Analysts Ratings - The Procter & Gamble Company
The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) enjoys a diverse product portfolio in the consumer packaged goods sector, with stable demand across various segments. Current analyst ratings suggest a balanced view, with a significant share of strong buy and buy recommendations, reflecting confidence in its resilient market position and ongoing growth potential amid potential macroeconomic challenges.
Historical Stock Grades
In the most recent data for November 2025, the analyst ratings for PG reveal a stable position with a total of 24 ratings. The distribution emphasizes a positive outlook with a combined total of 14 strong buy and buy ratings, complemented by a notable proportion of hold ratings, indicating a balanced appreciation of the company's prospects.
| Rating Type | Number of Ratings | Score Visualization |
|---|---|---|
| Strong Buy | 4 | |
| Buy | 10 | |
| Hold | 10 | |
| Sell | 0 | |
| Strong Sell | 0 |
Sentiment Development
- The total number of analyst ratings has remained relatively stable over the past year, with slight fluctuations.
- There has been a noticeable decline in the strong buy ratings over the months, reflecting a cautious sentiment incrementally growing in the analyst community.
- A concurrent rise in hold ratings suggests a wait-and-see approach from analysts in light of market conditions.
- Despite these shifts, buy ratings have remained a significant part of the overall sentiment, showcasing sustained confidence.
Percentage Trends
The recent distribution of ratings indicates a possible trend towards neutrality, with a modest decline in strong buy recommendations and a stable presence of buy ratings, balanced by a robust hold category. This transition could denote a tempered investor confidence.
In November 2025:
- Strong Buy: 16.67%
- Buy: 41.67%
- Hold: 41.67%
- Sell: 0%
- Strong Sell: 0%
Over the past 12 months, the significant observation is the systematic reduction in strong buy ratings, contrasted by consistent buy recommendations which appear to stabilize the sentiment.
Latest Analyst Recommendations
The latest analyst recommendations for PG show a predominant trend of maintaining existing ratings, indicating a stable view on the company's market positioning.
| Date | New Recommendation | Last Recommendation | Publisher |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-27 | Neutral | Neutral | JP Morgan |
| 2025-10-20 | Outperform | Outperform | Raymond James |
| 2025-10-10 | Neutral | Neutral | JP Morgan |
| 2025-10-08 | Buy | Buy | UBS |
| 2025-10-08 | Buy | Buy | B of A Securities |
Analyst Recommendations with Change of Opinion
Recent shifts in analyst recommendations for PG reveal an underlying caution in some quarters, with downgrades indicating a potential recalibration of expectations amid evolving market conditions.
| Date | New Recommendation | Last Recommendation | Publisher |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-07-25 | Neutral | Overweight | JP Morgan |
| 2025-07-14 | In Line | Outperform | Evercore ISI Group |
| 2025-04-25 | Outperform | Sector Perform | RBC Capital |
| 2024-11-25 | Buy | Neutral | DA Davidson |
| 2024-09-30 | Equal Weight | Overweight | Barclays |
Interpretation
The current market sentiment towards PG suggests a conservative yet steady confidence in its performance, reflected in the significant presence of buy and hold ratings. The occasional downgrades may hint at a cautious outlook amidst uncertain market dynamics. Generally, the sentiment remains stable, although analysts appear vigilant for any potential shifts in market conditions or company performance that may influence future recommendations.
Conclusion
Overall, The Procter & Gamble Company's stock benefits from a stable analyst outlook with significant support from buy and hold ratings. While recent trends indicate decreased strong buy recommendations, the consistent buy sentiment reflects sustained confidence. Amid potential economic challenges, the market appears to value PG's robust product portfolio and resilient market presence. Investors should consider both the stability in ratings and the caution reflected in recent downgrades when assessing their positions in the stock.