July 25, 2025 a 08:38 pm
GS: Analysts Ratings - The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
The recent analyst ratings for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. demonstrate a cautious market sentiment. Although the company remains a key player in the financial services sector, the predominance of 'Hold' ratings suggests hesitance among analysts. A notable decrease in 'Strong Buy' ratings indicates a shift towards a more conservative outlook on the stock. Investors should closely monitor these trends as they evaluate the potential risks and rewards associated with their investment strategies.
Historical Stock Grades
The latest data from July 2025 indicates a noticeable accumulation of 'Hold' ratings for Goldman Sachs, reflecting a neutral to cautious sentiment in the market.
| Rating | Count | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Strong Buy | 3 | |
| Buy | 6 | |
| Hold | 14 | |
| Sell | 1 | |
| Strong Sell | 1 |
Sentiment Development
Over the past months, there has been a notable increase in 'Hold' ratings, rising from 9 to 15 at their peak. Meanwhile, 'Buy' and 'Strong Buy' categories have seen a reduction, which could suggest waning enthusiasm or increased caution among analysts.
- The total number of ratings has remained relatively stable, albeit with shifts in distribution.
- 'Hold' ratings have gained prominence, indicating a cautious stance.
- 'Strong Buy' ratings have decreased, suggesting a reduction in strong confidence among analysts.
Percentage Trends
Analyzing the percentage distribution of ratings reveals a clear trend towards greater caution. The reduction in 'Strong Buy' percentages, coupled with an increase in 'Hold', underscores analysts' tempered expectations.
- The proportion of 'Hold' ratings has consistently grown, emphasizing analysts' neutral outlook.
- 'Buy' recommendations have diminished, reflecting less aggressive optimism.
- Overall, there is a clear shift towards a more conservative assessment of the company's prospects.
Latest Analyst Recommendations
Recent analyst recommendations reflect a steady sentiment with no significant upward or downward shifts, suggesting consistent market assessment.
| Date | New Recommendation | Last Recommendation | Publisher |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-07-21 | Neutral | Neutral | Citigroup |
| 2025-07-17 | Equal Weight | Equal Weight | Morgan Stanley |
| 2025-07-17 | Market Perform | Market Perform | Keefe, Bruyette & Woods |
| 2025-07-14 | Market Perform | Market Outperform | JMP Securities |
| 2025-07-08 | Reduce | Hold | HSBC |
Analyst Recommendations with Change of Opinion
There have been a few downgrades, indicating some shifts in opinion which may suggest recalibrations based on market developments or internal adjustments.
| Date | New Recommendation | Last Recommendation | Publisher |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-07-14 | Market Perform | Market Outperform | JMP Securities |
| 2025-07-08 | Reduce | Hold | HSBC |
| 2025-03-19 | Perform | Outperform | Oppenheimer |
| 2025-01-06 | Neutral | Buy | UBS |
| 2024-11-26 | Hold | Buy | HSBC |
Interpretation
The analyst recommendations for Goldman Sachs currently exhibit a conservative sentiment, with a prevalence of 'Hold' ratings. This trend may suggest that analysts are uncertain about the company's short-term growth prospects amidst market volatility. The relatively stable nature of these ratings could highlight a lack of significant positive catalysts for the company, or a wait-and-see approach from analysts. While there is some support from 'Buy' recommendations, the overall reduction in confidence points towards a more cautious market sentiment.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. remains a powerhouse in the financial sector, recent trends in analyst ratings indicate a cautious market outlook. The increase in 'Hold' ratings suggests a wait-and-see approach, reflecting both the company's potential for growth and existing uncertainties in the financial landscape. Investors should weigh these factors carefully, considering their investment horizon and risk tolerance. Monitoring future analyst updates will be crucial in assessing any shifts in sentiment that could impact investment decisions.