November 27, 2025 a 01:00 pm
DUK: Analysts Ratings - Duke Energy Corporation
Duke Energy Corporation, a significant player in the U.S. energy sector, is experiencing a stable phase with the majority of analysts leaning towards a 'Hold' recommendation. The company's diverse energy portfolio, combined with a consistent customer base, suggests that while there is limited downside risk, there is also a lack of immediate catalysts for significant upside gains. Analysts continue to watch economic conditions and regulatory environments closely, as these factors play pivotal roles in the stock's future performance.
Historical Stock Grades
The current ratings for Duke Energy Corporation reflect a cautiously optimistic outlook, dominated by 'Hold' positions. The detailed ratings as of November 2025 are as follows:
| Recommendation | Count | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Strong Buy | 2 | |
| Buy | 8 | |
| Hold | 12 | |
| Sell | 0 | |
| Strong Sell | 0 |
Sentiment Development
Over recent months, overall sentiment towards Duke Energy's stock has shown stability with a defensive stance. Despite fluctuations in individual rating categories, the aggregate rating count remains consistent at 22. The trend reveals:
- Strong Buy recommendations have remained low, indicating cautious optimism.
- Hold ratings persist as the dominant sentiment, suggesting market uncertainty.
- Buy recommendations exhibit slight month-to-month variation, showing subtle shifts in investor confidence.
Percentage Trends
The percentage distribution of analyst ratings over the past few months shows notable stability, highlighting a trend towards conservatism. Observations include:
- Hold ratings consistently account for about 55% of total recommendations.
- Buy and Strong Buy ratings form approximately 45% of the total, depicting moderate positive sentiment.
- A marked absence of Sell or Strong Sell recommendations indicates perceived long-term security in Duke Energy's business model.
Recent months reflect a shift from Strong Buy to Buy recommendations, signaling cautious optimism due to external market conditions and Duke’s steady performance.
Latest Analyst Recommendations
Recent updates in analyst recommendations depict a stable outlook for Duke Energy Corporation, with no significant changes in ratings. Below are the most recent analyses:
| Date | New Recommendation | Last Recommendation | Publisher |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-27 | Outperform | Outperform | Mizuho |
| 2025-10-22 | Equal Weight | Equal Weight | Morgan Stanley |
| 2025-10-14 | Overweight | Overweight | Barclays |
| 2025-10-10 | Outperform | Outperform | BMO Capital |
| 2025-10-10 | Neutral | Neutral | UBS |
Analyst Recommendations with Change of Opinion
Some analysts have adjusted their opinions on Duke Energy, reflecting nuanced views on the company's potential and risks. Notable changes include:
| Date | New Recommendation | Last Recommendation | Publisher |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-03 | Sector Outperform | Sector Perform | Scotiabank |
| 2025-09-26 | Hold | Buy | Jefferies |
| 2025-06-25 | Buy | Neutral | Goldman Sachs |
| 2024-10-22 | Sector Weight | Overweight | Keybanc |
| 2024-10-15 | Outperform | Neutral | Mizuho |
Interpretation
The current sentiment surrounding Duke Energy Corporation indicates stability with a cautious outlook. The predominance of 'Hold' recommendations reflects a lack of clear bullish indicators but also suggests confidence in the company's resilience. The absence of 'Sell' ratings points to perceived security, with only minor adjustments in analyst sentiment indicating market condition considerations. This stability underscores confidence in Duke Energy's diversified energy distribution and infrastructure capabilities.
Conclusion
Duke Energy Corporation's stable analyst ratings underscore a measured confidence in its operational resilience amidst a challenging market environment. The share's Hold-dominant consensus suggests limited volatility and a reliable, albeit modest, investment prospect. With Duke's diversified portfolio and expansive U.S. presence, analysts recognize both steady income and potential regulatory challenges. As external conditions evolve, market participants appear to favor a wait-and-see approach, which could shift as economic indicators change.