Boston Properties, Inc. has maintained a relatively stable dividend with a yield of 5.81% and a current dividend per share of $4.38. The company exhibits credibility with a 29-year history of dividend payments. However, the lack of recent growth highlights areas of concern regarding the potential for future dividend increases.
The financial metrics presented reveal critical insights into the company’s dividend yield and payment history.
| Key Metric | Data |
|---|---|
| Sector | Real Estate |
| Dividend yield | 5.81% |
| Current dividend per share | 4.38 USD |
| Dividend history | 29 years |
| Last cut or suspension | None |
A strong dividend history over 29 years underlines Boston Properties’ commitment to its shareholders. This long-term track record is a positive signal for potential investors seeking consistency in returns.
| Year | Dividend per Share (USD) |
|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.96 |
| 2024 | 3.92 |
| 2023 | 3.92 |
| 2022 | 3.92 |
| 2021 | 3.92 |
The dividend growth rate for Boston Properties is stagnant over both a three and a five-year measurement period.
| Time | Growth |
|---|---|
| 3 years | 0% |
| 5 years | 0.47% |
The average dividend growth is 0.47% over 5 years. This shows moderate but steady dividend growth.
The Payout Ratio indicates how well the company can maintain its dividend payments with its earnings and cash flow.
| Key figure | Ratio |
|---|---|
| EPS-based | -15631.16% |
| Free cash flow-based | 60.47% |
The extremely negative EPS-based payout ratio reflects discrepancies in earnings, potentially calling into question the sustainability of its dividend on earnings compatibility. The FCF-based ratio of 60.47% warrants attention but remains within a cautious acceptable range.
Analyzing cash flow and capital efficiency metrics are primordial for assessing a company's financial health and investment returns.
| Metric | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free Cash Flow Yield | 8.35% | 11.80% | 10.54% |
| Earnings Yield | 5.51% | 1.72% | 0.12% |
| CAPEX to Operating Cash Flow | 31.04% | 0% | 0% |
| Stock-based Compensation to Revenue | 1.67% | 0% | 1.29% |
| Free Cash Flow / Operating Cash Flow Ratio | 68.96% | 100% | 100% |
The cash flow statements exhibit a moderate capital efficiency and robust cash flow coverage, critical for capital-intensive industries like real estate. Improvement between 2022 and 2023 in free cash flow yield is encouraging.
These metrics signify financial stability, evaluating liquidity and leverage levels to support long-term viability.
| Metric | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt-to-Equity | 239.60% | 282.89% | 313.75% |
| Debt-to-Assets | 60.70% | 63.87% | 65.11% |
| Debt-to-Capital | 70.55% | 73.88% | 75.83% |
| Net Debt to EBITDA | 7.91 | 8.09 | 8.24 |
| Current Ratio | 3.16 | 4.19 | 2.51 |
| Quick Ratio | 3.16 | 4.19 | 2.51 |
| Financial Leverage | 3.95 | 4.43 | 4.82 |
The leverage ratios indicate a heavily leveraged position, which could constrict financial flexibility, yet ratios remain manageable given current industry standards.
Probing into profitability models reveals how well the company can sustain operations and flush out further growth potentials.
| Metric | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Return on Equity | 9.51% | 3.24% | 0.26% |
| Return on Assets | 2.41% | 0.73% | 0.05% |
| Net Margin | 18.77% | 5.81% | 0.42% |
| EBIT Margin | 46.89% | 26.61% | 21.40% |
| EBITDA Margin | 56.94% | 56.98% | 55.99% |
| Gross Margin | 63.03% | 62.72% | 61.15% |
| Research & Development to Revenue | 0% | 0% | 0% |
The declining trend in return metrics and net margin reflects challenges Boston Properties faces in maximizing equity and asset utilization, though still showing strength in its margin profile.
| Criteria | Score | Visualization |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 4 | |
| Dividend Stability | 5 | |
| Dividend growth | 2 | |
| Payout ratio | 3 | |
| Financial stability | 3 | |
| Dividend continuity | 5 | |
| Cashflow Coverage | 3 | |
| Balance Sheet Quality | 3 |
With a stable dividend history and formidable dividend yield, Boston Properties, Inc. presents a compelling case for dividend-investment strategies. However, stagnant growth and leveraged financials suggest a cautious examination of future profitability is advisable before considering long-term investment.